Tuesday 26 July 2011

Beware: Cloud computing's green claims aren't always true


A recent report from the Carbon Discloser Project shines a green light on cloud computing, but an efficient cloud still could be using dirty power


Cloud computing must be green. After all, those who provide cloud computing technology say so, most cloud advocates say so, and even those who check up on such things say so.
Take the Carbon Discloser Project, for example. It just published a report on cloud computing and carbon emissions, "Cloud Computing: The IT Solution for the 21st Century." The conclusions were exciting: "The results show that by 2020, large U.S. companies that use cloud computing can achieve annual energy savings of $12.3 billion and annual carbon reductions equivalent to 200 million barrels of oil -- enough to power 5.7 million cars for one year."
[ Get the no-nonsense explanations and advice you need to take real advantage of cloud computing in InfoWorld editors' 21-page Cloud Computing Deep Dive PDF special report. | Stay up on the cloud with InfoWorld's Cloud Computing Report newsletter. ]
However, there are flaws in the report, according to GreenMonk analyst Tom Raftery and as reported in ReadWrite Web. Chief among those flaws is the assumption that energy savings necessarily equate to reduced carbon emissions. "If I have a company whose energy retailer is selling me power generated primarily by nuclear or renewable sources, for example, and I move my applications to a cloud provider whose power comes mostly from coal, then the move to cloud computing will increase, not decrease, my carbon emissions," Raftery says.
It's a valid point: The idea of becoming more cost-efficient typically means you're more carbon-efficient as well -- but not always. If you go green, then you need to hook up fewer and fewer computers to grids that are powered by coal, whether they are cloudlike or not. 
To Raftery's point, sometimes using cloud computing will make it worse, like moving 1,000 local servers from a nuclear- or wind-powered grid to 500 servers in a cloud powered by coal. Although cloud computing typically means resource pooling, thus using fewer computers, it matters more where they run when you consider the greenness of cloud computing -- or any form of computing for that matter.
So, once again, things are not cut and dry. There are many "it depends" moments when we talk about the greenness of cloud computing. But reducing energy usage through the cloud's greater efficiency is still a good development overall.

Wednesday 22 June 2011

HP, Toshiba Collaborate on Cloud Computing

Hewlett-Packard and Toshiba will collaborate to push cloud computing and related services to infrastructure organizations, the companies said



The companies will jointly work "to identify and develop opportunities" in areas such as water supply, energy, health-care and transportation where cloud-related services can be deployed, the companies said in a joint statement. The companies will also collaborate in the areas of networking and "intelligent infrastructure."
HP will provide its IT expertise while Toshiba will provide its domain knowledge in critical infrastructure areas. Besides being a computer and chip maker, Toshiba also makes products for other industries including energy, health care and transportation. For example, Toshiba's power system company makes equipment for nuclear power plants, and its medical systems unit makes X-ray equipment and magnetic resonance imaging systems.
The collaboration will also pave the way for HP to deploy products and services being researched in the company's labs, according to the statement. HP has research efforts going on in fields such as cloud services, security, infrastructure development and solar energy.
Toshiba said the collaboration will help grow its Smart Community Business Division, which was formed in October 2010 and is focused on building smart grids and modernization of infrastructure. By taking advantage of cloud computing and other opportunities in the area of "smart community", the company hopes to grow the business of the division from ¥300 billion (US$3.7 billion) in fiscal year 2010 to ¥900 billion in 2015. Toshiba last month acquired smart meter company Landis+Gyr for $2.3 billion, which Toshiba said would help expand division sales. Read More

Friday 17 June 2011

Can David Thodey escape his Big Blue shadow?


opinion One cannot help but feel that there was a certain irony to David Thodey’s life yesterday which must have been impossible for the Telstra CEO to ignore.
The executive’s first major engagement of the day saw him spruiking the benefits of Telstra’s rapidly expanding cloud computing strategy to a sizable room full of Telstra staff, Telstra customers and Telstra partners … oh, and a small handful of journalists and analysts which happened to be along for the ride.
Surrounded by those with a vested interest in seeing Telstra’s cloud computing strategy succeed, in a high-tech conference room in the telco’s demonstration facility at 400 George St, Sydney, it was hard not to jump straight on board Telstra’s rocketing cloud vision and head straight for the stratosphere.
On paper, Telstra’s launch yesterday had everything. The right, top-tier partners (Cisco, Accenture, Microsoft, VMware), a headline splash of funding ($800 million), a flashy new infrastructure investment (a new datacentre for Melbourne) and a clutch of new customers, all keen to sing the virtues of Telstra’s strategy.
And it went well for the most part. Aside from a few tough questions from the floor and the sighs of the audience when the inevitable fluffy video case study was played, there was a note of triumphalism in the air; as if by speaking a vision aloud, Telstra could truly make it so. But it was only when the hour-long Telstra love-in broke up that the irony of Thodey’s day became clear … and some reality set in.
I believe it may have been Telstra spokesperson Craig Middleton, MC’ing the event, who mentioned at that point that Thodey had a tight schedule to meet, so the Telstra event could not run over time. It was time for the Telstra CEO to speak at another event — one which could not help but bring the ghosts of Thodey’s past back to haunt him.
Across town, the wizards at IBM were kicking off another public relations exercise designed to rocket their own company’s profile into today’s newspapers, and yesterday’s web pages. In case you’re not aware, this week the industry’s grizzled warhorse is celebrating 100 years in business — and all across Australia and the globe, IBM workers are shaking off the Big Blues which have bedeviled the group over the past few years (think Lotus Notes) and letting their hair down in style.
In Australia, IBM yesterday gathered five of the past managing directors of its Australian division — plus the current one, Andrew Stevens, to impart their wisdom and give a sense of history to the occasion. In the room listening were many of the same journalists who attended Telstra’s presentation that morning. In fact, Thodey could have given a few a lift across town to the ritzy surrounds of Bilson’s Restaurant in the Radisson Hotel in his Corolla — I’m sure he could have squeezed a few hacks in the back seat.
And of course, Thodey, who led IBM Australia from 1999 to 2001, had to be on stage with his former colleagues to share in the glorious nostalgia.
But how galling, it must have been for the Telstra chief executive, to sit there on stage and listen as IBM Australia’s current leader, Andrew Stevens, spoke at length about the company’s own plans to capitalise on the growing cloud computing revolution … the one which Telstra so desperately wants to conquer.
One wonders just what Thodey’s reaction must have been, with Telstra likely being IBM’s biggest customer in Australia, as Stevens explained how IBM wasn’t afraid to “cannibalise” its existing business in order to focus on cloud.
That morning, Telstra had boasted that it had spoken to no less than 160 Australian organisations about their cloud computing strategy. What then, must Thodey have thought, sharing the stage with Stevens, when the IBM chief noted Big Blue had had some 2,000 cloud computing engagements located around the globe?
What, precisely, did Thodey think, when a Computerworld Australia interviewer questioned him this week extensively about the difference in his experiences at IBM and Telstra? When the same interviewer mentioned to him that Telstra was now a cloud company, “too”?
The Telstra chief executive’s situation this week, which saw him caught between two worlds, between two companies who each compete with each other yet are each other’s major local customers, one Australia’s biggest traditional technology company, and one Australia’s biggest telco, must have weighed heavily on his mind.
And there are indications that it has done so for some time.
In his time at Telstra, Thodey has often been unable to escape the Big Blue shadow which seems to follow him around.
The executive joined Telstra in April 2001 to lead its fast-growing mobiles division, but held down the position only for 18 months before being shifted into a role which he seemed almost typecast for — swapping the mass consumer market of the mobile sector for Telstra’s Enterprise and Government division, which serves large corporate customers like Westpac.
Because of this switch, it was now-departed Telstra executive David Moffatt — who joined Telstra in the same year as Thodey and was likewise seen as a CEO contender from that time — who spearheaded the company’s mobile expansion throughout the past decade, while Thodey dined with many of the same corporate customers he serviced at IBM — Westpac being one of the biggest.
During Thodey’s time at the Enterprise & Government wheel Telstra also made its ill-fated decision to buy IT services upstart KAZ — which had begun fighting multinationals like IBM and EDS tooth and claw in the Australian market. While Telstra has since disposed of the troubled acquisition, it is that buy, and Telstra’s struggles to integrate the people-focused KAZ with its networks-focused telco business — that Thodey is most remembered for during most of his past decade at Telstra.
Under Thodey’s tenure as Enterprise and Government chief, Telstra bought KAZ, which Thodey was ultimately responsible for overseeing. And it was one of the last actions of Thodey’s predecessor in the CEO seat — Sol Trujillo — that KAZ was finally sold to Fujitsu in 2009.
Now Thodey appears to be giving some indications that he is winding Telstra’s clock back … into the trouble-plagued world of IT services.
With the departure of long-serving network engineer Michael Rocca from Telstra’s COO seat has come a new COO for the company — Brendan Riley, a long, long-time IBM executive who Thodey must have known from his days at the company, and who on paper appears to have virtually no experience running a major telco … which is now his job.
From a prior history at now HP-owned IT services business EDS (as well as a more recent tenure at Tabcorp and other organisations) has come Robert Nason, who is steering Telstra’s internal Project New revamp. And from Hewlett-Packard has come Gordon Ballantyne, who now has overarching responsibilities for Telstra’s Consumer and Country Wide divisions.
Detecting a pattern here? You should be. Through his prior history at Telstra, his recent lieutenant appointments and his current strategy of taking Telstra into cloud computing (which in reality, is just the next generation of enterprise and consumer IT services), David Thodey is not treating Telstra as a networks business or a telco at all.
He is starting to shape Telstra into a traditional IT company.
The dangers of such an approach are manifest. First, and most obviously, it’s a path Telstra has visibly failed at before with its botched integration of KAZ, a saga legendary in Australia’s technology sector.
Telstra doesn’t do “IT” well; an idea best represented by the fact that it has traditionally outsourced the majority of its IT infrastructure operations to IBM and the development of its platforms to companies like Accenture. These are the same systems that the company is now turning around to spruik as solid cloud computing platforms to major Australian enterprises and government departments.
But there is also the fact that in pushing so hard into the cloud computing market, Thodey is positioning Telstra for a major turf war with existing industry giants. And there are some big names in there — names much, much bigger than Telstra’s on the global stage. HP. CSC. Fujitsu. Salesforce.com. Google. Amazon. Even (despite its local partnership), Microsoft. And of course IBM.
There is a great deal of validity to Thodey’s contention that customers will in future want their networks integrated with their cloud computing provider’s systems; it simplifies things and has the potential to deliver technical advantages such as higher levels of stability and speed.
However, ultimately one also has to question whether major Australian organisations want Telstra to run all of their infrastructure … from telecommunications, to storage, to servers, to operating systems and even some applications. It’s a soup to nuts strategy; but as many chief information officers would say, you’d be nuts to put all of your eggs in one basket; especially when that basket can sometimes be a former monopolist basket case.
Then again, one has to question why Thodey is pushing hard into this market at all.
Telstra’s Enterprise and Government division has always been a minor part of its business; the far larger piece of the telco’s pie is in its consumer divisions: traditional fixed line, BigPond, and now, increasingly, Next G. These are the big money spinners, so what’s Thodey doing with his head in the cloud … especially in a week when Telstra is due to finally reveal its $13 billion deal with NBN Co?
Now, none of this means that Thodey’s the wrong man for the Telstra CEO job. In a short time he has succeeded in silencing most of his critics; he’s finally righting Telstra’s customer service wrongs and we expect big things from Telstra’s deal with NBN Co and its internal renewal. God knows the company can’t do anything wrong when it comes to its Next G mobile network.
But it does suggest that Thodey’s IBM past still weighs strongly on his current mindset. He’d better get his head back in the telco game. Or someone — likely whoever takes over Optus when Paul O’Sullivan finally steps down — is going to pull a fast one on him.  Read More

Cloud computing goes mainstream

Lately, we've been hearing a lot about cloud computing. Amazon's and Apple's recently announced cloud computing services have generated a lot of buzz.

But if you don't understand why cloud computing is the future of computers, you're not alone.
The "cloud" simply refers to the Internet. "Cloud computing" refers to software and services that run over the Internet. Webmail like Gmail and Hotmail are considered cloud computing. So are online backup services like my national radio show's advertiser Carbonite.com.
You can access cloud computing services and data from virtually any Web connection. Let's take a look at Amazon's and Apple's cloud services and the advantages they offer. Find links to apps and programs mentioned at Komando.com/news.
Amazon Cloud Drive
Amazon Cloud Drive provides 5 gigabytes of free storage. That holds about 1,000 songs, 2,000 photos or 20 minutes of high-definition video. There is a 2 GB size limit per file. You can upload documents, videos, music, photos and more.
You get unlimited access to your files from up to eight devices. Amazon will upgrade your account to 20 GB for a year at no charge. You just have to buy an MP3 album. If you need more storage, Amazon offers paid plans. They start at 20 GB and top out at 1,000 GB (1 terabyte). You'll pay $1 per gigabyte per year. Plans renew automatically.
There are different ways to upload and download files. You can store MP3s purchased from Amazon on Cloud Drive automatically. Purchased music won't count against your storage limit. You can upload or download single files via your Web browser. To download multiple MP3s, you'll need the Amazon MP3 downloader. It runs on Windows XP, Vista and 7 and OS X.
Clicking a music file from your account will open the Amazon Cloud Player. You can listen to your music directly from the Web. You can only play MP3 files or AAC (M4A) files that are DRM-free. There's also a Cloud Player app for Android phones and tablets.
Apple iCloud
iCloud is a free service that replaces MobileMe. It is integrated into apps and iTunes. Some iCloud features appear in iTunes 10.3 beta, but the full roll-out is this fall. iCloud provides 5 GB of free storage. You can also store up to 20,000 songs purchased from iTunes. Other purchased content and photos don't count against your limit.
When you purchase a song from iTunes, you can download it to any of your devices. Past purchases are available, and you can have music downloaded automatically. You can't play music directly from iCloud. You must download it.
You probably have music purchased from another store or ripped from CD. In that case, there's iTunes Match ($25 yearly). It scans your music collection. You can listen to music already in iTunes. If music isn't available, you can upload it from your collection.
iCloud isn't just about music, though. Photo Stream syncs photos taken on your iOS device with other devices. You can view and download photos to other iOS devices, PCs, Macs and Apple TVs. A Photo Stream album containing your last 1,000 photos is created. New photos are stored for 30 days.
iCloud also backs up a variety of other data, like apps, text messages and iWork documents. You get a free email address that works across all your devices. And it stores your calendar and contacts and syncs entries across all your devices. If you choose, you can create a calendar to share with your entire family.
To get all the features of iCloud, you'll need iOS 5 on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. Mac users need OS X Lion. It is available in July for $30. Windows users need Vista orWindows 7. Outlook 2007 or 2010 is recommended for accessing contacts and calendars.
As users, we are in the midst of a paradigm shift. No longer is our data, music, media, photos and documents tied to a particular computer at a specific location. When all this moves into the cloud, access to your files is literally at your fingertips.
Kim Komando hosts the nation's largest talk radio show about computers and the Internet. To get the podcast or find the station nearest you, visit:www.komando.com/listen. To subscribe to Kim's free email newsletters, sign up at:www.komando.com/newsletters. Contact her at C1Tech@gannett.com.

Thursday 16 June 2011

IBM turns 100: From punch cards to cloud computing

Big Blue has come a very long way since it was established a century ago and former Australian leaders gather to reflect on their time with the company and where its heading



Big Blue was first formed in 1911 as the Computing Tabulating and Recording Company, specialising in punch cards, commercial scales and clocks. Fast forward 100 years, top priorities revolve around technology within the healthcare sector and cloud computing.
As it turned this milestone, former IBM Australia head honchos Brian Finn (1980 – 1993), Bob Savage (1996 – 1999), David Thodey (1999 – 2000), Phil Bullock (2001 – 2005), Glen Boreham (2006 – 2010) and current managing director, Andrew Stevens, all gathered in Sydney to celebrate the occasion. Collectively the leadership line up has clocked 150 years worth of experience with Finn and Savage working for IBM for 35 years each.
Current managing director, Andrew Stevens, said it had a very serious investment in talent and financial resources in cloud computing.
“Cloud is one many challenges, opportunities, innovations and IBM is right in the thick of it,” Stevens said.
Stevens said the challenge and benefit of cloud computing was that it enforced innovation within the industry.
“I’m confident in our ability to come up with a solution for many of our clients and we’ll be a lead player,” he said.
Stevens also pointed to the importance and value associated with data as well as the role it will play within the health sector.
“The big contribution we’ll make is in health because of the role that data, high performance computing, modelling, computation and mathematical skills – it’s going to require a lot of that,” he said.
As the company approached its 100 year milestone, it has achieved worldwide revenues of $100 billion.
It has come a long way since its inception and entrance into the Australian market in 1932. Brian Finn was leading the company at the time it made half a century in 1982.
He reflected on some of his biggest achievements citing the team of people he worked with, as well as surviving two recessions.
“I recall the near death experience in the early 1990’s when IBM was in serious trouble, and it was very serious – it made the global financial crisis look like a blip,” Finn said. “We had to transform our company and close to a third of the people left.
"Managing through that period was difficult, but at the end of the day it was rewarding because it start the conservation of Australia and New Zealand and the terrific group of people that we had at the end, they were the people who really wanted to be part of the company going forward. It was a tremendous thing for me to experience.”
The transaction between Telstra, Lend Lease and IBM, was a life-changing transition for Big Blue, during Bob Savage’s tenure.
As a result of the Telstra deal, it entered into contracts with government departments and private health insurers.
“We had seen revenue declines in big clients in the work force in Australia, commoditisation of hardware products, and we went from a supplier of hardware and software to someone who was embedded in the client,” Savage said. “Radical shifts and changes  happened during those years.” Read More

Weighing up the cost of the cloud


Many businesses are still unclear on how best to deploy Cloud services and to date have adopted a circumspect approach towards them. Recent research found that nearly three-quarters of SMEs don't use Cloud Computing and around half of those said they didn't know what the term meant. So, while there are lots of benefits such as speed of implementation and increased flexibility, for many organisations it is apparent more education is needed, particularly when it comes to its cost. 
Traditionally, businesses have relied upon on-premise IT, which has required staying on top of capital expenditure and generally provided fixed costs. But the move towards Cloud services is resulting in more payment options, so it is important that organisations choose the most appropriate option for their business. A lot of the talk around Cloud at the moment is around the advantages of its pay as you go model.
This means organisations can pay for what they use and chop and change services as they go, providing greater flexibility. But what many organisations don’t realise is it can actually end up more costly than they think. For example, if IT keeps indulging in add-on services without really accounting for the extra expense, they could find costs escalating out of control. The ease of paying for some Cloud services is evident as IT is able to pay for them on credit cards, rather than wasting time going through the usual IT procurement channels. Furthermore, within this Cloud model, businesses have to share servers and bandwidth with other users. Therefore, if a competing application or service is seeing high demand at a particular time this could have a negative impact on the performance of other businesses’ services.  
Alternatively, businesses could consider a dedicated server environment as their ‘cloud’ solution. Organisations can run exactly what they want, when they want. By opting for this Cloud model, it is possible to have dedicated resources at a fixed monthly cost, which can work out much more cost effective in the long term. Just like we’ve seen with mobile phones, monthly contracts seem to be the preferred, economically-viable option for many users and there is no reason for Cloud Computing to not go down a similar path. All that’s needed is greater awareness of the choices available.
When it comes to the cloud, organisations need to have a reality check. They should be asking themselves how frequently their business and IT requirements are going to change. Once this is determined, they need to carefully evaluate and decide which payment option is really the best for them.
Having awareness of the different prices and models available for the Cloud, rather than just defaulting with pay as you go, will mean businesses are less likely to receive unexpected costly bills. After all, you wouldn’t go out and buy a new mobile phone if you hadn’t looked at many of the tariffs available. At a time of tightened budgets, IT and business heads need to work together and think about which Cloud will push their organisation to new heights.  Read more

Cloud computing unlocks possibilities but raises security concerns


Chances are you’ve already got your head in the clouds.
If Google has its way, you’ll trust even more of your life to the digital cumulus.
The next-generation Internet speeds that Google promises for the Kansas City market could tempt people to store more of their virtual lives — music collections, family photo albums, software applications — on the so-called cloud rather than in their own computers.
“Google wants your Internet experience to be through one of its products, so you’ll see more of its ads,” said Josh Olson, a technology industry analyst at Edward Jones & Co. “For those ads to work, they need to have traffic. They want you in their cloud.”
That’s a good part of the reason Google plans to string fiberoptic cable to nearly every home and business in Kansas City and Kansas City, Kan. It’s an express elevator to the Internet cloud.
And what’s the cloud? It’s anything that’s kept on the Internet rather than on your computer’s hard drive.
Like anything that has to do with technology, the cloud brings all the possibilities of convenience and worries about security.
Technologists regularly say the cloud is to your data what the bank is to your money. Keep the cash in a safe in your basement, and it’s probably secure. Put it in the bank and you surrender security to somebody else in return for interest and the convenience that comes with checking and credit cards and ATMs.
Lock your data up on a hard drive, and it’s hard for anyone to steal your secrets. Put them in an Internet vault on the cloud, and there’s a risk that some thief might hack your stuff.
But for convenience, the cloud backs up your virtual goodies in case your home computer breaks down. As long as you’ve got the Internet, you’ve got access to all your digital stuff wherever you are.
Cloud computing stores your digital belongings on remote computer servers rather than on your own hardware. That means you don’t have to buy as much physical storage. In the end, because the servers are shared and used to fuller capacity, it’s a cheaper way to store things.
Cloud rolling in
For years the cloud has been a tech industry buzzword, implying some cyber trend that might alter how we put the Internet to work. We’ve gradually shifted our electronic valuables to the cloud. Gartner Research estimates worldwide spending on cloud computing neared $70 billion last year, almost two-thirds of that in North America. The trend has been gradual and, at least from the consumer’s view, not quite revolutionary.
Apple just announced plans for its iCloud, a way to use the Internet to sync your iPod with your MacBook and your iPhone and the rest of your
iStuff. If you have a song or
a photo on one device, it will
automatically show up on them all.
That comes as more and more of what we do online has already migrated to the cloud.
Google, for instance, offers an entire suite of free programs from spreadsheets (think Microsoft Excel), to word processing (think Microsoft Word), to slide show presentations (think Microsoft PowerPoint) available to anyone with an Internet connection. In 2010, Microsoft responded with its own free set of online Office programs.
Without trying very hard you’ve probably been floating on the cloud for a while. If you’ve used an email account from Gmail or Yahoo or Hotmail, you’ve trusted part of your life to the cloud. Likewise, if you listen to music on Pandora, you’ve tapped into its possibilities. What is YouTube (another Google property) if not a cloud depository of video?
Now, in Kansas City especially, the jump to the clouds is about to become more profound. The Google Fiber project could shift use of the cloud to another gear.
Consider the fledgling Google Music program. It offers the possibility of delivering all your music and playlists to any gadget, anywhere that can connect to the Internet. But here’s the bummer: First you must upload all of your music to Google’s cloud. For somebody with several thousand songs in a library, shifting all those files to the cloud could take days on a typical Internet connection. But with the 1 gigabit-per-second upload speeds that Google says it will bring to town, a day’s chore takes less than an hour.
“That faster connection is going to get rid of the ‘that’s-a-pain’ factor,” said Olson, the technology analyst.
Consider streaming video. It’s essentially cloud computing, because the movies are stored on remote computer servers and delivered to your desktop or television only when you need them. Netflix traffic already accounts for 22 percent of all Internet traffic and 30 percent during the Web’s busiest hours. With the connections Google hopes to bring to town, as one analyst put it, your movie “will start instantly and never stutter or burp.”
Suddenly, watching video over the Internet looks far more attractive. And it might be only the start.
Game on
Gamers are in for a special treat. No longer will their soldier or wizard fantasies be limited by the graphics card or the computing power of the machinery on their desktop. Instead, they’ll be able to play in virtual worlds powered by always improving hardware and software kept on servers at some distant location. All they’ll need is a monitor and the meekest of computers that can pass along their actions on a mouse or keyboard.
“What you need in your home is just a screen showing all the bits on its pixels. The real work is done somewhere else,” said Dan Andresen, a computer scientist at Kansas State University.
As a bonus, he points out, because all that computing work is done somewhere else, your desktop will be sucking down significantly less electricity.
More than two-thirds of us have multiple computers or smartphones, which could benefit from a faster path to a cloud that might store all the things we want to access through all of our gadgets.
That might mean that for the first time, the next computer you buy might need less processing power and less storage. Why buy that stuff, after all, if the cloud takes care of you?
“It doesn’t need much storage or memory. All it is doing is sending and receiving data,” said Jeff Melcher, the chief executive of NetStandard in Kansas City, Kan.
His firm already hosts offsite data storage for businesses and has begun storing software programs and data for consumers. He expects more of that with warp speed connections of Google’s fiber optics.
“The device you’ll need now is going to rely on the cloud as the home base for all its thinking,” he said. So, Melcher added, your hardware can afford to be relatively “dumb.”
Or consider voice recognition. Google has just added voice search to its Chrome Web browser, much like what it builds in to the company’s smartphone Android operating system. It’s not your computer or your phone that makes sense of your voice — it requires a much larger database and more computing muscle than you could dream of affording. Rather, it’s Google’s data centers, more than two dozen billion-dollar-plus server farms spread around the world.
“We have an advantage because we’re a company that was born of the Web that has never done anything else,” Dave Girouard, a Google executive overseeing the company’s cloud-based software, said in Steven Levy’s book about Google, “In the Plex.”
Partly cloudy
Life on the cloud will pose some complications. Forrester Research issued a report earlier this month suggesting that people tap into so many online services they end up confused: Where are my photos, my online bank accounts, my employer’s health benefit management page? Forrester says 29 percent of Americans can’t keep track of all their usernames and passwords.
That may be why people are scared of the cloud. Nearly a third don’t back up their files outside their home, leaving them vulnerable to theft or fire or computer breakdown. One in five don’t send around the files they’d like to because they worry about hitting size limits — a situation that would practically disappear with the Internet connections Google is promising to Kansas City.
Of course, the cloud has its limits.
Take your computer somewhere the Internet can’t reach, and the upside vanishes. A downside rests in the risk that someone might tap into whatever information you’ve stored with others. Think again of the bank analogy, but without the FDIC. If your data get exposed, nothing is secret again. Just this year there have been sizable data breaches at Sony and Citi, at Lockheed Martin and the New York Yankees, at the International Monetary Fund.
Yet the world has been voting with its bits, and sending them to remote locations. Frank Gillett, a technology analyst at Forrester Research, said the prospect of any time, any place access and multiple backups had lured people to the cloud despite remote security risks.
“In general,” he said, “consumers trade privacy for convenience.”    Read More